Loading Page...

22 November 2012

Not prioritising design education is ‘disastrous’!

Speaking on Radio 4’s Start The Week programme, Frayling told presenter Andrew Marr, ‘I thought the whole debate [about design education] had been won, but the argument has slipped incredibly in the last few years.

‘In economic terms the great debate since the 1990s has been about the creative industries, and art schools have had a critical impact on the whole creative sector. The Treasury has predicted that by 2017 around 50 per cent of new jobs in the UK will come from the creative sector.’

Frayling said moves such as the Russell Group of universities not accepting art and design GCSEs as a prerequisite, and the exclusion of art and design from the English Baccalaureate were ‘economically disaterous’.

He also highlighted the disconnect between design and the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects, whose funding is protected.

Frayling said, ‘If only the Browne Review [on higher education funding] had mentioned design… I actually spoke to Lord Browne about this after the publication and said, “What about design?” and he said, “What a good idea. What are we going to do about it?” Well the horse has bolted now.’

Frayling was joined on the programme by Ron Arad, Anthony Gormley and RCA history of design tutor Sarah Teasley.

They also discussed the disconnection between design and manufacture in the UK, with Frayling saying, ‘At the moment we’re coming up with the ideas and someone in China is manufacturing them. Design has become this kind of abstracted thing, and it’s got to be brought back together with manufacturing.’

Arad said, ‘At the moment a lot of design students graduate and are very grateful that there are places like Italy that can employ them.’

By Angus Montgomery

Go back to news